![]() ![]() ![]() It was also an attempt to maintain some degree of BA. My thought is there is a limit to how proficient one can be at a task, but you can still get better through having higher ability scores. I need to make that revision to some of the monsters posted here). If your monster doesn't have a good method to counter chill touch then don't calculate the regeneration in the effectie HP (PS. One thing to consider regarding regeneration is that it is very easy to neutralize (chill touch cantrip) if your monster doesn't have immunity to cantrips or somethign similar. Also, I'm not sure this is mention in the DMG, but as currently designed you do not add regeneration that is part of a legendary action (this is assumed to be equal in CR value to the damage of a legendary action which should be included in the CR). Any creature above CR 25 or anyone fighting a creature above CR 25 should expect it to have multiple resistances and immunities. I revised that row to be 17-25 and adding a row 26 or more which indicates no hit point modifier for creatures above CR 25. The "Effective Hit Points." table on pg 278 of the DMG has the last row in the table as 17 or more. However, there is one difference between using the table in the DMG and this table. Useing the Table: Refer to the 5e DMG pages 273-278 "Creating Monsters" for the guidelines to use this Chart.Here is my revised epic monster design table, with the notes below explain why I changed the things I changed. Thus, I created a revised Monsters by CR table to bring the CR of epic creatures in-line with how I felt they should be. Just raising the CR of each monster is treating the symptoms and not the problem, IMO. And, oddly the CR feels about right, but the challenge of that CR does not. I could have simply increased the CR of each monster, to make them tougher however, my goal is to make CR 21+ monsters feel more epic. ![]() Thus, I decided to update all epic monsters (CR 20+) with beefed up stat blocks. I had hoped this wouldn't be the case with 5e, but all evidence points to the fact that some bit of optimizing can make the big bad look a bit sad. In 4e it could be rather trivial to defeat epic threats, so much so WotC even revised the guidelines 2x (and still didn't get it right IMO). The reason for these changes, as hinted above, is that I feel the WotC epic monsters are a little lacking. If you peruse my epic updates you will notice that there is a significant power difference between an "official" CR 30 Tiamat and my CR 30 avatar of Tiamat. WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE "OFFICIAL" MONSTERS?: This started with 4e and I quickly made the switch to 5e. Also, as it looks like WotC as no intention of providing 5e stats for the greater gods, I started to make my own. Though I appreciated WotC efforts, I want more epic goodies and, frankly, I like my epic threats a little more threatening. I don't typically run published adventures, but I bought RoT, PotA, & OotA to get my hands on the "official" epic villains inside. They are a big reason why over the past 30 years I have been a PC for about 2 and DM for 28! From the beginning I wanted to be Demogorgon or Tiamat or Thor, etc. Primarily because ever since the 1e Monster Manual and Deities and Demigods and the Immortals Handbook of BECMI, I have been fascinated with Demon Lords, Archdevils, Dragons, Gods and epic monsters of all sorts. There are multiple reasons I have chosen to write-up epic monsters. This update to the OP is my attempt to introduce this little project of mine to the broader community. Well, maybe it's 5e or the move to EnWorld (or both), but this thread has gotten a lot more attention, so it is time to get a little more serious. I had a similar thread at the old WotC forums for 4e epic monsters and it got very little attention,I assumed this would be more of the same. I didn't give it much thought initially because this was really just a personal project for myself and perhaps a few others. It was brought to my attention that this thread doesn't have a proper introduction (thanks CapnZapp), and I must say I agree. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |